Re: RFS since

[Neil Spring <nspring@cs.washington.edu>]

Luk,

I believe your "closes" entries should match the expression,

 /closes:\s*(?:bug)?\#\s*\d+(?:,\s*(?:bug)?\#\s*\d+)*/ig

listed by  
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s- 
upload-bugfix

That is, the numbers should be prefixed by "#".

-neil

On Saturday, July 19, 2003, at 01:14  PM, Luk Claes wrote:

> > Luk Claes (luk@zeus.UGent.be) wrote:
> > > I am looking for a sponsor for since (see  
> > > http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
> > I'm not an expert, but how about pointing out that you're intending  
> > to adopt the
> > orphaned package since and that you have added the (previously  
> > lacking)
> > build-dependency thus closing all bugs for since. Possibly it might  
> > be worth
> > mentioning whether you've successfully compiled in a chroot (e.g.  
> > with pbuilder) so
> > you're sure that there aren't any non-build-essential  
> > build-dependencies besides
> > debhelper and whether it's (approximately) lintian clean.
>
> Well I thought looking at the changes file is not too much trouble.  
> Here
> is a fragment:
>
> Changes:
>  since (0.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
>  .
>    * New upstream version.
>    * New maintainer (closes 201365).
>    * debhelper in Build-Depends (closes 190527).
>    * Updated to standards version 3.5.9.
>
> -lintian and linda have no comments
>
> I checked the build dependencies with pbuilder. There were no more
> dependencies required.
>
> Cheers
>
> Luk
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact  
> listmaster@lists.debian.org

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: PGP signature