Re: Correct version numbering for pre-Versions?
- To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Correct version numbering for pre-Versions?
- From: frank@kuesterei.ch (Frank Küster)
- Date: Sat, 03 May 2003 17:00:44 +0200
- Message-id: <87bryk6pnn.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>
- In-reply-to: <20030430141752.GA7729@wompom> (Andrew Stribblehill's message of "Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:17:52 +0100")
- References: <873ck02pmr.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch> <20030430130505.GI8024@phobos.fs.tum.de> <20030430141752.GA7729@wompom>
Andrew Stribblehill <a.d.stribblehill@durham.ac.uk> schrieb:
> IMO a release should have a bare version number. What I did is this:
>
> cfengine2-2.0.5-1
> cfengine2-2.0.5+2.0.6-pre1
> ...
> cfengine2-2.0.6-1
>
> Then all ugliness is confined for when you're doing ugly things :)
That looks ugly^W err, nice.
Thanks, Frank
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
Reply to: