Re: Moving packages from "Requested" to "Can't be packaged"

To: andy.grafham@ntlworld.com
Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Moving packages from "Requested" to "Can't be packaged"
From: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 13:23:16 +0200
Message-id: <20030425112316.GB14901@matilda.phys.uu.nl>
In-reply-to: <20030425102156.IXEP2283.mta01-svc.ntlworld.com@[10.137.100.61]>
References: <20030425102156.IXEP2283.mta01-svc.ntlworld.com@[10.137.100.61]>

Hi andy.grafham!

You wrote:

> Is there any way of requesting the BTS to move a package from
> "Requested" to "Can't be packaged"? I was investigating packaging
> "VisualBoyAdvance" a gameboy advance emulator, but it looks like
> license problems will make it impossible to include in debian.

AFAIK, there is no automatic way of doing this.  
What about adding a new tag, something like CBP (cannot be packaged), to
the wnpp?

-- 
Kind regards,
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bas Zoetekouw              | GPG key: 0644fab7                     |
|----------------------------| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
| bas@o2w.nl, bas@debian.org |              a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Moving packages from "Requested" to "Can't be packaged"
  - From: "Leo \"Costela\" Antunes" <costela@debian.org>
- Re: Moving packages from "Requested" to "Can't be packaged"
  - From: Arnaud Vandyck <arnaud.vandyck@ulg.ac.be>

References:
- Moving packages from "Requested" to "Can't be packaged"
  - From: <andy.grafham@ntlworld.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Building stable packages
Next by Date: Re: Moving packages from "Requested" to "Can't be packaged"
Previous by thread: Moving packages from "Requested" to "Can't be packaged"
Next by thread: Re: Moving packages from "Requested" to "Can't be packaged"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread