Re: Upstream debian/ dir.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 07:40:56PM +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On 20030213T213418+0000, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > The only drawback I can see is changes in the packaging between
> > releases leads to a whole new src tarball to upload to the archive
> > rather than just a new diff, but hopefully this shouldn't happen too
> > often.
> I once did this, and usually I let upstream release with the old
> debian/ directory; I would then, after release, make my debs, and my
> changes to debian/ were recorded in the diff. I would at that point
> commit the new debian/ to upstream CVS.
That sounds like the least invasive approach so far.
J.
--
Black Cat Networks Ltd. - UK Domain, Web and Email hosting.
The truth is out there, but also in here.
Email: sales@blackcatnetworks.co.uk
Web: http://www.blackcatnetworks.co.uk/
Reply to: