On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 16:45, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > The BTS is to keep track of who request uploads of each package. A mail > is so easily forgotten in debian-mentors ... and the web archive of the > list is really not useful at all. I agree with finding a BTS solution to the yet informal way sponsors are handled, but just to suggest another option: We could use another tag to the wnpp pseudo-package, like RFS (Request For Sponsor), wich would be a second step, after an ITP has been filled by a New Maintainer... What do you all think? Is there a blatant reason why this method should also be rejected? Cheers -- Leo Costela Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc "you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!"
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part