Re: snd-smotif

[Stefan Schwandter <e9925373@student.tuwien.ac.at>]

Stefan Schwandter wrote:

> I provided a snd-smotif package in addition to the snd-dmotif package,
> because policy wants it like that, although some people agreed that it's
> pointless to do so since openmotif is in debian (non-free).

> Now I received a bug report that snd-smotif should be in non-free
> instead of contrib. My failure, didn't think of that then.

> I now intend to just drop the -smotif package. Do I have to fear a
> serious bug against snd-dmotif because there's not an -smotif version
> anymore?

After having read the policy again, I noticed that it's only a
"should"-directive to provide both dynamically and statically linked
versions of a motif using package - so I suppose I don't have to fear a
serious bug report, right?


regards, Stefan


-- 
Wanna listen to my music? <------
----> http://www.shockfrosted.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org