Re: Bug severity question

To: Will Newton <will@misconception.org.uk>
Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug severity question
From: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <shalehperry@attbi.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 14:04:08 -0800 (PST)
Message-id: <[🔎] XFMail.20020401140408.shalehperry@attbi.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] E16s9WB-0005FD-00.2002-04-01-22-39-12@mail4.svr.pol.co.uk>

On 01-Apr-2002 Will Newton wrote:
> 
> Is it acceptable to downgrade a serious bug to important if it is a build 
> error on an arch that has never built correctly in the past?
> 
> The problem is being worked on, it's just taking a little time, and I see no 
> reason to make users of another architecture suffer because of this.
> 

sounds reasonable.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug severity question
  - From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>

References:
- Bug severity question
  - From: Will Newton <will@misconception.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Bug severity question
Next by Date: ${shlibs:Depends} - What is it?
Previous by thread: Bug severity question
Next by thread: Re: Bug severity question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread