Re: upstream numbering scheme debian compliant ?
Gustavo Noronha Silva <kov@debian.org> writes:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 09:46:19 -0500
> christophe barbé <christophe.barbe.ml@online.fr> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 02:48:57PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>> > > The current gphoto2 release is 2.0beta5 wich is packaged as 2.0beta5.
>> > > For the final release 2.0, I will package it as 2.0final.
>> > >
>> > > What would be the best numbering scheme for the next beta series to
>> > > avoid the use of final for the stable release ?
> why don't you do 2.0beta2 then -> 1:2.0 ? I think it is quite consistent
Epoch are practical but ugly. Please avoid them as much as possible.
--
Jérôme Marant <jerome@marant.org>
<jerome.marant@free.fr>
http://marant.org
Reply to: