[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#89433: I want to adopt osh



On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:36:31AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> p Is writing something like:
>  Note that this license is not compatible with the GPL.  This means that
>  you can't redistribute the binary of osh if it is complied with libraries
>  licensed under the GPL.  The debian package is compiled with libc6 and
>  libncurses5, which seem to have no problem to me (Oohara Yuuma), but I am
>  not a lawyer.
> into a Debian pacakge copyright file a good idea?

Probably not.

> o DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="debug,nostrip" && debuild 
>   will never work, because debuild does unset env vars.
>   DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="xxxx" dpkg-buildpackage 
>   DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="xxxx" debian/rules
>   should work though.

Eh, from the debuild manpage: 

       As environment variables can  affect  the  building  of  a
       package,  often  unintentionally,  debuild  sanitises  the
       environment by removing all environment  variables  except
       for  TERM,  HOME,  LOGNAME, PGPPASS, PGPPATH, FAKEROOTKEY,
       DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS and the locale variables LANG and  LC_*.

Oops, that has changed since potato. Thanks for pointing this out :)

> My personal feeling is that I don't like large diffs,
> and Debian-specific modifications.

Fully agreed. 

Greetings

	Torsten

Attachment: pgpzRRELyqn4n.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: