On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 10:35:37PM -0800, Yves Arrouye wrote: > > > > Incidentally, why is the source package called 'gphoto2'? I see that > > > there is still a 'gphoto' package in Debian; is that not superseded by > > > gphoto 2.0? Are there reasons that someone would need both gphoto and > > > gphoto2 installed on their system, or why some people need one and > > > others need the other? > > No gphoto and gphoto2 are really different and both should be available. > > gphoto is a all-in-one package to provide gui access to a digital > > camera. > > gphoto2 is a library which is used by frontend (gui). A command-line > > frontend is included in the package but others are available. > Then why not libgphoto2? Or something making it more obvious it's a lib?s > YA The package does also provide the binary called 'gphoto2'. Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgp1NeKI7I_vo.pgp
Description: PGP signature