Re: j2sdk build-depends cannot be satisfied?
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:52:00PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > If you want to specify which of a set of real packages should be the
> > default to satisfy a particular dependency on a virtual package, you
> > should list the real package as an alternative before the virtual one.
> >
> > If kaffe works for Kenneth, I guess his Depends line is fine. By the way,
> > isn't the question about Build-Depends (not Depends)?
>
> I managed to get the Build-Depends right (I proved that with a chroot
> build), but I wasn't sure what to list for Depends, since the
> newly-build library will only run (for the time being, anyway) under
> kaffe, not gij.
Then you should probably file a bug to gij explaining the problem.
Regards,
// Ola
> KEN
>
> --
> Kenneth J. Pronovici <pronovic@ieee.org>
> Personal Homepage: http://www.skyjammer.com/~pronovic/
> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
> temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
> - Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: