Re: GNAT

[jmarant@nerim.net (Jérôme Marant)]

Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> writes:

> Jon Ward <aardvark@fnord.org.uk> writes:
>
>> I would like to adopt the gnat package.
>
> What about gnat-doc?  There are a number of problems with it (non-free
> license, wrong copyright information in general, the RM should be
> separate).

  What about ACT not fixing bugs in the GNAT public releases?
  What about them not caring at all for bugs reported in the
  BTS and not sending any patch?

  The next GNAT maintainer must be warned that ACT does not
  cooperate very nicely with the community and it is still the
  case of the GNAT in the GCC tree.
  (Prove me wrong)

  Cheers,

-- 
Jérôme Marant

http://marant.org