Re: How to specify architectures *not* to be built?
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 16:35, Geert Stappers wrote:
> When the cause of the buildproblem is in the package, fix the problem
> there. The package maintainer hasn't to do it by himself,
> he can/must/should cooperate with people of other architectures.
> A sign like "!hurd-i386" looks to me like "No niggers allowed",
> it is not an invitation to cooperation.
So you think I should keep my selinux packages as architecture any, even
though they will never run on on HURD or BSD?
What about the Trusted BSD support packages? If Trusted BSD gets support on
multiple BSD architectures then should it be listed as architecture any even
though it will never compile on Linux?
--
I do not get viruses because I do not use MS software.
If you use Outlook then please do not put my email address in your
address-book so that WHEN you get a virus it won't use my address in the
>From field.
Reply to: