Re: Bug#89433: I want to adopt osh
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 23:21:23 +0900,
Junichi Uekawa <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Oohara Yuuma <email@example.com> cum veritate scripsit:
> > debian/rules says:
> > | # to compile with debugging information:
> > | # $ debuild -e DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="debug,nostrip"
> > | # (this won't work:
> > | # DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="debug,nostrip" && debuild)
> > Note the word "won't".
> That won't work, because it is syntactically incorrect,
> and also this is not a place to document how to write
> bash command lone.
I cut and pasted
debuild -e DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="debug,nostrip"
and it worked. I can't see why this is syntactically incorrect.
"Delete 4 lines of comments in debian/rules" is a wishlist bug.
Anyway, I have already deleted them.
> Can you just make the patch smaller with
> +int fatal(mes)
> which looks much better.
> > > o Why are you building the binary with -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer?
> > I like optimization, but I don't know it well. Can you tell me
> > a better option?
> Usually Anything more than -O2 has problems on some
> architectures, and it is not advisable to use anything more than
> -O2 unless you know what you are doing.
s/-O3 -fomit-frame-pointer/-O2/ done
> > > o are you sending the mods to the upstream ? / have you
> > > contacted the upstream ?
> > Not yet.
> Please do.
Oohara Yuuma <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Graduate-school of Science, Kyoto University
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695
I always put away what I take.
--- Ryuji Akai, "Star away"