Re: lintian goes wild?

["Christian T. Steigies" <cts@debian.org>]

On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 12:43:34PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > main::(/usr/lib/perl/5.6.1/asm/unistd.ph:114):
> > 114:        eval 'sub __NR_iopl () { &not  &supported;}' unless defined(&__NR_iopl);
> 
> On i386, this line is:
> 
>     eval 'sub __NR_iopl () {110;}' unless defined(&__NR_iopl);
> 
> Hypothesis: on m68k, iopl() is not supported, or asm/unistd.h doesn't
> define __NR_iopl, or it misdefines it. I'll bet the "not supported"
> comes from either a configure script output or that is what __NR_iopl is
> (wackily) defined as on m68k in <asm/unistd.h>.
Talking about /usr/incluse/asm/unistd.h?
 
#define __NR_olduname           109
#define __NR_iopl               /* 110 */ not supported
#define __NR_vhangup            111
#define __NR_idle               /* 112 */ Obsolete
#define __NR_vm86               /* 113 */ not supported
#define __NR_wait4              114

We need to fix the kernel (again)?

Christian
-- 
http://people.debian.org/~cts/