Re: GPG Key Signing (Was: Advocate/Sponsor)
>>"Samuel" == Samuel Tardieu <sam@debian.org> writes:
Samuel> Well, then why not talk about "id signing" instead of "key
Samuel> signing" which exists but designates a completely different
Samuel> thing that also exists in GPG?
Because these procedures have been known as key signings since
the beginning of time? That anyone who works with PGP/GPG already
knows what it means? Because most people use language to sommunicate,
and communication implies a basis set of accepted semantics and
language, and the accepted nomenclature is key signing? Because I am
more interested in conveying my ideas than nit picking irrelevant
details?
manoj
--
There are bugs and then there are bugs. And then there are
bugs. Karl Lehenbauer
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: