Re: Bug#101325: lintian: empty (transition) packages shouldn't n
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 05:10:36PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> That's what the "next PACKAGE;" achieves.
> Alternatively, in such a case, set a variable $empty_package = 1 and
> then test the value of this variable around the checks block (lines
> 1127--1221). There may be some other things which should be blocked
> out, but this does not seem intrinsically difficult.
It's slightly more difficult than that, because you do want to keep
the warnings about the control file and other metadata.
--
Richard Braakman
Looking for a job writing free software.
See http://www.xs4all.nl/~dark/resume.html
Reply to: