Re: to conffile or not to conffile
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 05:30:03PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > worry that some package will come along and wipe out their changes
> > > simply because it wasn't a conffile.
> >
> > A package that does anything that braindamaged, must not be allowed outside
> > unstable (and its maintainer needs a carefully applied cluebat for maximum
> > skull damage).
>
> s/unstable/experimental/
Actually, I think you're right. However, I was feeling a bit too nice for my
own good when I wrote that reply, and didn't want to shove it on the face of
the maintainers that insist on doing LinuxConfish things to configuration
files...
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
Reply to: