Re: building a sponsored package
Previously Colin Watson wrote:
> If this is your only rationale, it is spurious, as you're talking about
> Maintainer: in debian/control while I'm talking about Maintainer: in the
> .changes file. The two are *distinct*.
They are not (any more), with the caveat you can override it using
a -m option for dpkg-gencontrol.
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| email@example.com http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |