On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 01:37:40PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > > My next (new for unstable) package, yardradius conflicts with radiusd-cistron and > > radiusd-livingston (and provides the same services - radiusd). > > Should I open a couple of bug reps for inclusion of the new package > > within control files of the other ones? > > Isn't enough that all three packages conflict with radiusd as a > virtual package, like mail-transfer-agents do? > > [ Please don't cross-post between debian-devel and debian-mentors ] Mmmm, at current time, I see radiusd-livingston conflicts with radiusd-cistron only, not with radiusd. Maybe a bug report should be filed for this, it does not provide radiusd as it should. So radiusd-cistron should be ok. -- Francesco P. Lovergine
Attachment:
pgppWOpiK9VIL.pgp
Description: PGP signature