Re: Key signing (PGP vs GPG)

To: Eduardo Trapani <etrapani@unesco.org.uy>
Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Key signing (PGP vs GPG)
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:06:01 +0200
Message-id: <20010723160601.A10491@fisch.cyrius.com>
In-reply-to: <3B5C27F0.4196DFDA@unesco.org.uy>; from etrapani@unesco.org.uy on Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 10:34:40AM -0300
References: <200107191711.NAA28077@saltmine.radix.net> <20010719185711.A111@apollo.udlug.org> <20010722115939.A18944@silly.cloud.net.au> <3B5C27F0.4196DFDA@unesco.org.uy>

* Eduardo Trapani <etrapani@unesco.org.uy> [20010723 10:34]:
> The developer that would be willing to sign my key uses PGP and not
> GPG.  Would that be a problem?

No, that is ok.

Reply to:

References:
- How do I control ownership of installed package files?
  - From: Steve McWilliams <stevemc@Radix.Net>
- Re: How do I control ownership of installed package files?
  - From: harpo@udlug.org
- Re: How do I control ownership of installed package files?
  - From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
- Key signing (PGP vs GPG)
  - From: Eduardo Trapani <etrapani@unesco.org.uy>

Prev by Date: Key signing (PGP vs GPG)
Next by Date: About NM, email and spam
Previous by thread: Key signing (PGP vs GPG)
Next by thread: Re: How do I control ownership of installed package files?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread