Re: source NMU

[cjw44@flatline.org.uk (Colin Watson)]

GerhardTonn@gmx.de wrote:
>I am going to upload packages for the s390 architecture. There are still a
>lot of packages which don't support s390 in config.sub and config.guess yet.
>Is it necessary to write a bug report and do a source NMU for each of these
>packages or is there a more generic approach?

File bugs and wait. Section 8.2.1 of the developer's reference describes
when you can do source NMUs as a porter; it's shorter than for
non-porters, although at least for unreleased architectures it's not a
bad idea to give the maintainer a bit of clearance first.

-- 
Colin Watson                                     [cjw44@flatline.org.uk]