[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

BSD license issues



    Hello,

    I recently posted an ITP to debian-devel (Bug #88567) for scanssh that
included the following questions.  I did not receive any reply which sounds
ok to me for the first question about the -E option, but I am not sure what
to do about the BSD license that is not identical to the one in
/usr/share/common-licenses.  Someone please advise.  Thanks!

----

- Upstream agreed with me that the semantics of the -E option (whether to
  exit if the exclude file is not specified/found) should change, and
  supplied me a patch from the CVS.  I want to avoid changing this option
  between releases, but this makes my package inconsistent with the
  published version.  It *is* documented as the new usage, but does anyone
  think that this is a particularly bad idea?

- License is BSD, except that it diffs with the license in
  /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD:

----------------------------  C U T   H E R E  ----------------------------

diff bsd /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD
0a1
> Copyright (c) The Regents of the University of California.
11,12c12,14
< 3. The name of the author may not be used to endorse or promote products
<    derived from this software without specific prior written permission.
---
> 3. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors
>    may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
>    without specific prior written permission.
14c16
< THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR ``AS IS'' AND
---
> THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
17c19
< ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE
---
> ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE

----------------------------  C U T   H E R E  ----------------------------

    I must assume this is ok, but since it does differ, do I need to go to
debian-legal to be sure?  I don't need to include the full license, do I?

----

Rene Weber

-- 
+---           (Rene Weber is <rene_autoreply@elvenlord.com>)          ---+
| "If you spend  any  time  administering  Windows  NT,  you're  far  too |
| familiar with the Blue Screen of Death..."  -- "MSDN Flash" newsletter, |
|                                                             Feb 9, 1999 |
+---  E-Mail Policy & web page: <http://satori.home.dhs.org/~rweber/>  ---+



Reply to: