Re: keeping files from one version to the other.
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Michael Beattie wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 01:48:06PM +0100, Ove Kaaven wrote:
> >
> > I talked about the doc section of policy (13.3), Julian Gilbey started
> > talking about config files; hence the logical implication for the
> > sufficiently argumentative (me): Julian Gilbey was talking about config
> > files in doc/. It didn't have anything to do with anything *you* said, but
> > what he said, and so it wasn't a reply to you. Simple as that.
>
> Beg to differ..
Why? You said to copy the files from doc and to where they belong, nowhere
did you say that the config files would stay in doc or anything. Then I
pointed at the doc part of policy, and I got a reply not-from-you that
said something about treating them as config files when I was talking
about /usr/share/doc. So the reply wasn't directed at you, isn't that
clear enough? Typically my remarks can be interpreted in many negative
ways, but I don't quite see how that mail can be interpreted as targeting
*you*, especially when I said that it didn't, and who it did target,
whether I'm mistaken in what I said or not.
This isn't a very constructive thing to argue anyway...
Reply to: