Re: metamail package
I'll take a look, and assuming nothing strange, I'm willing to sponsor it.
You should go ahead and contact the reporter of the unclear wishlist bug
you mentioned, though.
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 05:21:25AM +0100, Michael Moerz <aon.912411198@aon.at> spake forth:
> Hi!
>
> Is there somebody who is willing to sponsor
> metamail? It's my first package and I am
> currently in the nm queue (initial contact
> with AM has been established).
>
> I thought that it would be wise to first go
> and have a try at the unstable package and
> fix the bugs mentioned at bugs.debian.org.
> Since I have accomplished this task I now
> think that it is time to seek a sponsor.
> (To be true one wishlistbug will be left
> open cause the bug reporter wasn't very
> informative about the bug he observed.
> Perhaps trying to contact him would
> solve that, but I am not an official dd,
> so I really think that I can't do that)
>
> Currently my gcc on my private machine
> seems to be a bit broken (the only workaround
> I found is to pull all "-" out from the
> comments and I really don't wanna change
> my whole systems header files that are
> needed), so I was only able to create a
> deb in a stable chroot environment. It
> was possible for me to install it and
> lintian doesn't complain (yeah, I do know
> that lintian just tests a set of common
> failures).
>
> If there is anyone interested have a look at
> http://idc19.iuccim.tuwien.ac.at/~mike/debian/index.html
> where all relevant data should be (even the
> unstable package built in an stable
> environment)
>
> --
> kind regards,
> Michael Moerz
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
--
Mike Markley <mike@markley.org>
PGP: 0xA9592D4D 62 A7 11 E2 23 AD 4F 57 27 05 1A 76 56 92 D5 F6
GPG: 0x3B047084 7FC7 0DC0 EF31 DF83 7313 FE2B 77A8 F36A 3B04 7084
Is truth not truth for all?
- Natira, "For the World is Hollow and I have Touched the Sky",
stardate 5476.4.
Reply to: