On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Yves Arrouye wrote:
[Compiling a library, --enable-shared and --enable-static]
> "All libraries must have a shared version in the lib package and a static
> version in the lib-dev package. The shared version must be compiled with
> -fPIC, and the static version must not be. In other words, each *.c file
> will need to be compiled twice."
Yes, but a package is supposed to handle that if it supports
--enable-shared and --enable-static. libtool is especially good for that.
> In any case, since I'm one of the upstream maintainers of the package I'm
> packaging, I just changed it so that it will compile both .o and .static.o
> w/ different flags. But I'm still interested in clarifying your answer.
.static.o is bad because it is not portable to other compilers. Why don't
you use libtool?
GPG public key available from http://phobos.fs.tum.de/pgp/Simon.Richter.asc
Fingerprint: A319 A60F 20F6 C8A4 3C86 54B4 99CD AC6E 79D1 B1E7
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!