Re: Sponsor's responsibilities
Peter Palfrader wrote:
>> I think a point could be made for including a bogus bug in a
>> guy's first package so he can learn the changelog procedure for
>> closing it while he's still in close contact with his sponsor.
> Since ITPs are now reported as bugs against wnpp you have your
> training bug.
Ah, sure. Problem solved. Thanks.
Both the fellows I'm sponsoring ITP'd before this existed, at least
formally. I recommended doing the wnpp bug anyway but it's easy
to make it a little stronger than a recommendation.