[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gnupg signing

Stefan Alfredsson writes:


> Quoting Britton <fsblk@aurora.uaf.edu>:
> > 
> > see any gpg options to mh, and if I include my scanned identification as
> > an attachment, then it will not count as input to the hash of the message.  

> This might be somewhat inconvenient, but how about including MD5 sums
> of the attachments in the body of the message, which is then signed?
> (i.e. md5sums *.jpg  + cutnpaste)

I made a sig separately and attached that. 'man gpg'...

; gpg --detach-sign --armor decklin-foster-id.jpg

There is no TRUTH. There is no REALITY. There is no CONSISTENCY. There
are no ABSOLUTE STATEMENTS. I'm very probably wrong. -- BSD fortune(6)

Reply to: