Re: gnupg signing
Stefan Alfredsson writes:
> Quoting Britton <email@example.com>:
> > see any gpg options to mh, and if I include my scanned identification as
> > an attachment, then it will not count as input to the hash of the message.
> This might be somewhat inconvenient, but how about including MD5 sums
> of the attachments in the body of the message, which is then signed?
> (i.e. md5sums *.jpg + cutnpaste)
I made a sig separately and attached that. 'man gpg'...
; gpg --detach-sign --armor decklin-foster-id.jpg
There is no TRUTH. There is no REALITY. There is no CONSISTENCY. There
are no ABSOLUTE STATEMENTS. I'm very probably wrong. -- BSD fortune(6)