On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 11:09:38PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 04:48:57PM -0800, Seth R Arnold wrote: > > My gut feeling is, after patching the upstream tarball with an upstream > > patch, it is still prinstine -- but that is my gut feeling. > > No, that wouldn't be pristine -- it's not as it was downloaded from the > upstream author, which is the whole point (IMHO). > > Admittedly the upstream patch doesn't belong in the Debian .diff.gz > file either, but it should be only a temporary situation until the next > upstream version. If nano-0.7.4-2 (the patched version) is admitted into frozen, I hope it would be the last upstream version for Potato, so it would be a long temporary situation. What do I do then? Just patch and recompile? Place a note somewhere? Thanks, Jordi
Attachment:
pgpWe0rwRqNMy.pgp
Description: PGP signature