Re: version numbers
On Thu, May 13, 1999 at 01:31:52AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Another possibility is the following. Increase the epoch at this
> point to 1 (so you would have version 1:1.1), but from now on use a
> triple version number, thus: this release will be 1:1.1.0 or 1:1.1,
> the next minor upgrade will be 1:1.1.1 (and *not* 1:1.11), the next
> major release will be 1:1.2.0 and so forth.
Exactly what I meant; thank you.
-=- James Mastros
--
First they came for the fourth amendment, but I said nothing because I
wasn't a drug dealer. Then they came for the sixth amendment, but I kept
quiet because I wasn't guilty. Finally they came for the first amendment,
and by then it was too late to say anything at all."
-=- Nancy Lebowitz
cat /dev/urandom|james --insane=yes > http://www.rtweb.net/theorb/
ICQ: 1293899 AIM: theorbtwo YPager: theorbtwo
Reply to: