BTS questions
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I've got two questions about using the bug tracking system,
and would appreciate your advice:
1) http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer says:
A developer who receives a bug from the tracking
system, or sees it on debian-bugs-dist, and takes
responsibility for it should hit Reply in their
favourite mailreader, and then edit the To field
to say nnn-done@bugs.debian.org instead of
nnn@bugs (nnn-close is provided as an alias for
nnn-done).
Taken literally, that means I should close bug reports as soon as I
acknowledge having received them; but that seems wrong to me. Am I
misinterpreting the above? I also noticed that the ``Unanswered
problem reports by maintainer and package'' messages periodically
posted to debian-bugs-reports say:
The following problem reports have not yet been
marked as `taken up' by a message to
done@bugs.debian.org or or `forwarded' by a
message to forwarded@bugs.debian.org...
Should I really close (`take up') each bug as soon as I accept
responsibility for (eventually) fixing it?
2) I have received a text file from the bug submitter in reference to
one of the ispell bugs, which I now want to forward to the upstream
developer. That file is approximately 8kB in size -- not large, but
if everybody added 8k example files to the BTS I suspect we'd run out
of space somewhere. The only mention of size I see is at
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting where it says:
If they are small please include in your report
any files you were using to reproduce the problem...
So how small is "small"? Of course I will make note of the
availability of the example file, if it's too large to include in the
BTS.
Thanks.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.1, an Emacs/PGP interface
iQCVAwUBN82z5a6Bk+4xtwghAQHl+QP+O/wiEZ+5JFDQemsIILkgzcBrs6AHbs/d
T60aLtjoERFrf5G49oU7ECWzqDhLByjr2X+ZyDxuGdiYDkbccsUD4yCd7uFkiPmQ
6Al76M48TMDJ0oArcl7HPqjMx3mE5an5LYHAMkpiJApcNdepyLCDzsYY02G5qwe2
9VEpfivKnEg=
=XjZN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: