Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk> writes: > That's OK, except that this package currently has 258 symlinks, and > both the number and details are likely to change on a fairly regular > basis. The thought of keeping that up to date is quite terrifying. > There must surely be a better way? No, not really. -- .....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>