Re: debstd trouble with multi-binary package
Adam P. Harris wrote:
> Joey Hess, as the maintainer of debhelper, do you see this as a
> situation that should change? I think we should eliminate any manuals
> suggesting debstd (or put it under a "historic" section), and try to
> get someone working on a debhelper equivalent. Perhaps a discussion
> of the pros and cons of debhelper, hand-roll (a la Manoj), and
> cvs-buildpackage and the like could be discussed also.
I certianly have no problwm with documents directing new maintainers to
debhelper. I think a discussion of other options would be good too.
see shy jo
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org