Re: RFC: regarding /etc/shells
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thu, 7 May 1998, Shaleh wrote:
> /etc/shells is not yours to mess w/. You are right there. Perhaps a
> update-shells or something?
This would be great for slink. Maybe for hamm is too late. I don't know.
My /etc/shells contains many shells I have never installed, but not tcsh.
So it seems there is an "implicit" policy of including all possible shells
in /etc/shells. If we agree in keeping this policy for hamm, then perhaps
the best thing to do would be to ask Guy Maor (passwd maintainer) to add
tcsh to /etc/shells.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNVH6JiqK7IlOjMLFAQEg2wP/aDdJZj/t28zp7cD0dzCda2Azh+cUofMy
eqXpgu692wxDyvcgkLgrKlXi0dCqNfHG4eGkcknDJ9WoMDLCgXewewcrL8R4SpzT
nthG7Q9iMj80jm94W2It6saAgOzNK6z21o3uD1ghzAaqHw1J57J6jjcd9UNe7OBl
hAmzj2lqy6k=
=7PhY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: