Hi again Maarten, Étienne Mollier, on 2025-02-01: > About this issue: >> Oh, and piuparts complains about something. Perhaps one with more knowledge >> is willing to have a look at salsa to see what is wrong here? >> >> https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/libpdb-redo > > The relevant message in piuparts' output would be: >>> Unpacking libpdb-redo3.2 (3.2.1-2+salsaci+20250129+24) ... >>> dpkg: error processing archive /var/lib/local-apt-repository/../../..//srv/local-apt-repository/libpdb-redo3.2_3.2.1-2+salsaci+20250129+24_amd64.deb (--unpack): >>> trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpdb-redo.so.3.2.1', which is also in package libpdb-redo3 (3.2.1-1) > > This is probably because libpdb-redo3.2 breaks and replaces > libpdb-redo3 but does not declare it in its control file, > causing dpkg to flag the conflict on the file > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpdb-redo.so.3.2.1 upon upgrade. Oh, I forgot to mention there's an example in the policy manual section 7.6.1[1] if that helps. [1]: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-in-other-packages Have a nice day, :) -- .''`. Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> : :' : pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da `. `' sent from /dev/pts/2, please excuse my verbosity `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature