Hi Steffen, Nilesh Patra, on 2024-07-18: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 05:29:55PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 01:21:15PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > > > I addressed the lintian errors/warnings and introduced d/u/edam besides > > > updating d/u/metadata. I proceeded to the sponsored upload minutes ago. Thank you for the version bump to the newer major version! > > > Did not find anything to contribute to the problem of the reproducibility test but did not want to just disable it either. IMHO we should just raise an issue with upstream and let them fix that :) Sadly, reprotest is not indicating the exact files that are contributing to the difference, I only know it is in the python3-pymol package. Hm. > > > > Maybe this helps you: > > > > $ debdiff control/source-root/pymol-data_3.0.0+dfsg-1+salsaci+20240718+11_all.deb experiment-1/source-root/pymol_3.0.0+dfsg-1+salsaci+20240718+11_all.deb > > Minutes after sending this I realised I compared the wrong files in a hurry. > Oops :/ > > I tried to diff again and everything is identical. Only diff is in dbgsym. > Seems like some embedded buildpath issue. If people want to tackle build reproducibility issues, the pymol repository on salsa is up to date, accounting for today's upload. Have a nice day, :) -- .''`. Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> : :' : pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da `. `' sent from /dev/pts/3, please excuse my verbosity `- on air: New Machine - New Horizon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature