Étienne Mollier, on 2024-05-30: > Some of the htslib packages were already available in their 1.20 > version counterpart, so I tried to finish the migration > yesterday as I had some time. I seem to have fumbled a bit the > samtools upload by forgetting to declare it requires libhts-dev > 1.20 specifically, as otherwise tests are not passing. Giveback > attempts are still capturing htslib 1.19, so I prepared a > samtols upload with bumped build dependency version. In the > meantime, there may be stray uninstallable samtools-test > packages in sid, as the arch-all package build went through, but > not the arch-anys. Otherwise not too much to worry about. > > If everything goes according to the plan, the htslib 1.20 > ecosystem should be consistent in testing in a couple of days. Erm, things didn't go according to the plan. Thankfully Salsa caught properly my failure to handle properly arch-any & no-arch-all builds (which went hidden behind the version discrepancy issue). Anyway this should be fixed in samtools 1.20-3 upload (I failed to dcut rm 1.20-2 in time). Hopefully it is good for real now. That's some entropy thrown at the archive in little time. Perhaps I should favor resting now and see how things evolved tomorrow. Have a good night, -- .''`. Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> : :' : pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da `. `' sent from /dev/pts/1, please excuse my verbosity `- on air: England - The Imperial Hotel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature