libzstd should not be maintained by Debian Med team - could some core team please take over (Was: libzstd 1.5.2 in Debian)

To: Stephen Kitt <skitt@debian.org>, Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Cc: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>, etienne.mollier@mailoo.org, mestia@debian.org, Fabio Pedretti <pedretti.fabio@gmail.com>, Debian Med Project List <debian-med@lists.debian.org>
Subject: libzstd should not be maintained by Debian Med team - could some core team please take over (Was: libzstd 1.5.2 in Debian)
From: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 11:40:36 +0100
Message-id: <YhNsJKNO3T8TK/iE@an3as.eu>
In-reply-to: <3cbfa308d9f935e380cd1051b9ae5b09@debian.org>
References: <CA+fnjVBhO3meDw4gmg2PpjDqNPryw=n2hdoTb7_EWBKHrNhskQ@mail.gmail.com> <3cbfa308d9f935e380cd1051b9ae5b09@debian.org>

Hi,

there was a (private) request to upgrade libzstd to latest 1.5.2.

I'd like to repeat that I'm really convinced that libzstd should *not*
be maintained in the Debian Med team but rather some core team in
Debian.  It is here for historic reasons but should have moved somewhere
more appropriately since it became its general importance.

Please consider this mail a team-orphane of the package.

Kind regards

    Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libzstd should not be maintained by Debian Med team - could some core team please take over (Was: libzstd 1.5.2 in Debian)
  - From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Cmake help needed for ncbi-vdb
Next by Date: Re: Can we remove probabel?
Previous by thread: Re: PIQUE
Next by thread: Re: libzstd should not be maintained by Debian Med team - could some core team please take over (Was: libzstd 1.5.2 in Debian)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread