Re: packaging new upstream camitk version (was: Bug#997120:)
Dear Emmanuel,
Am Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 10:28:13AM +0100 schrieb Emmanuel Promayon:
> I managed to get the package to build (and not just the binaries!) and
> autopkgtest to run without error.
Cool! Thanks a lot.
> I just pushed the required modification and two patches.
> Note that I had to use sed in d/rules for override_dh_auto_configure, hope
> that's ok.
I've seen and implemented way dirtier hacks. ;-)
>
> Lintian still generates the following warnings:
>
> W: libcamitk-dev: breaks-without-version libvtk6-dev
> W: libcamitk-dev: breaks-without-version libvtk6-java
> W: libcamitk-dev: breaks-without-version libvtk6-jni
> W: libcamitk-dev: breaks-without-version libvtk6-qt-dev
These should probably be fixed but I've left them for the moment.
> W: camitk-actionstatemachine-dbgsym: elf-error In program headers: Unable to
> find program interpreter name
> [usr/lib/debug/.build-id/83/0781678cd786e5d7340380a0d1074859ea04dd.debug]
> W: camitk-config-dbgsym: elf-error In program headers: Unable to find
> program interpreter name
> [usr/lib/debug/.build-id/40/79f01584001da5d32afc39dbf8c4adb7712db1.debug]
> W: camitk-imp-dbgsym: elf-error In program headers: Unable to find program
> interpreter name
> [usr/lib/debug/.build-id/c4/7f965eb7c264b0ef8c8d30f7dce4b2efb95156.debug]
> W: libcamitk-dev-dbgsym: elf-error In program headers: Unable to find
> program interpreter name
> [usr/lib/debug/.build-id/6f/09e2cf16e8735811b635934b45cb9ba5685c17.debug]
> W: libcamitk-dev-dbgsym: elf-error In program headers: Unable to find
> program interpreter name
> [usr/lib/debug/.build-id/a3/619ed63907cc10f5dad87bb69191821ccbbac5.debug]
> W: libcamitk-dev-dbgsym: elf-error In program headers: Unable to find
> program interpreter name
> [usr/lib/debug/.build-id/b5/d4c9c627c9b6299d54cd0bfe137d1258917cab.debug]
> W: libcamitk-dev-dbgsym: elf-error In program headers: Unable to find
> program interpreter name
> [usr/lib/debug/.build-id/cc/46eb2adbcb8ae5b43f61ff4ed3702940e121e8.debug]
> N: 1 hint overridden (1 warning); 0 unused overrides
I think these are false positives.
> I am not sure how to deal with both:
> - breaks-without-version → when I tried adding "(>= 6.3.0)" in d/control,
> running "cme check dpkg-control" said "unnecessary greater-than versioned
> dependency")
I admit I'm also not sure here and decided to ignore these warnings for the
moment.
> - elf-error → this one I don't really understand!
>
> Would it be possible for you to check this?
I've checked and uploaded to *new* (due to the new binary package names).
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: