[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Request for review] plast



Hi Nilesh,

Am Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 11:51:19PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> 
> I have attempted to port plast to pcre2 for fixing up #999991
> But since I have not used pcre2 myself earlier, I am unsure whether my patch is
> sensible enough.
> 
> Could someone please do a review?
> Andreas, since you ported 'src:phast' to fix the one-million'th bug, could you please take a look at this?

I do not use pcre neither - but your patch looks similar in principle
to what I found out by reading the docs.
 
> All changes in salsa, and patch can be found here[1]
> 
> [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/plast/-/blob/master/debian/patches/pcre.patch

I've build and was running autopkgtest.  Since these are the main
criterions for me I simply took the freedom to sponsor your changes.

Thanks a lot for working on this

       Andreas.

PS: Another package in need of pcre3 -> pcre2 migration is pftools.
    IMHO we should rewrite its test first (which is needed due to new
    upstream way to run test and do the pcre-rewrite *afterwards*
    to make sure we have a sensible comparison for the tests.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


Reply to: