Re: [Request for review] plast
Hi Nilesh,
Am Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 11:51:19PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
>
> I have attempted to port plast to pcre2 for fixing up #999991
> But since I have not used pcre2 myself earlier, I am unsure whether my patch is
> sensible enough.
>
> Could someone please do a review?
> Andreas, since you ported 'src:phast' to fix the one-million'th bug, could you please take a look at this?
I do not use pcre neither - but your patch looks similar in principle
to what I found out by reading the docs.
> All changes in salsa, and patch can be found here[1]
>
> [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/plast/-/blob/master/debian/patches/pcre.patch
I've build and was running autopkgtest. Since these are the main
criterions for me I simply took the freedom to sponsor your changes.
Thanks a lot for working on this
Andreas.
PS: Another package in need of pcre3 -> pcre2 migration is pftools.
IMHO we should rewrite its test first (which is needed due to new
upstream way to run test and do the pcre-rewrite *afterwards*
to make sure we have a sensible comparison for the tests.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: