[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing]



Hi Flavien,

Am Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 04:33:28PM +0100 schrieb Flavien Bridault:
> I have understood the problem. The missing image filter has moved in an
> optional module, ITKReview.
> 
> Two possible solutions:
> 
> 1. modify the ITK package in order to enable the build of the ITKReview
> module

I'm not sure whether I understand this correctly.  We probably want a
feature complete package.  If not our users might be surprised about
missing features in other applications as well.
 
> 2. remove the filter from sight build - this is what we did on Windows and
> why it builds with ITK5.... ^^

Finally its your decision. 

> This image filter is really non-essential, so I guess it is easier to take
> solution 2, can you confirm please ?

Its perfectly fine whatever you decide.

Kind regards

      Andreas.


> > Hi Andreas,
> > 
> > I am a bit disappointed it doesn't build because we do use ITK5 on
> > Windows.
> > 
> > Anyway, I'll take care of this of course, thanks for trying. :)
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > 
> > *Dr. Flavien BRIDAULT*
> > Director of Software Development
> > IRCAD France & IRCAD Africa
> > 
> > flavien.bridault@ircad.fr <mailto:flavien.bridault-louchez@ircad.fr>
> > Tél. : +33 (0)3 88 119 201
> > 		IRCAD France
> > http://www.ircad.fr/
> > http://www.ircad.africa/ <http://www.ircad.fr/>
> > 
> > Suivez l'IRCAD sur Facebook
> > <http://www.facebook.com/pages/IRCAD/193785273990141>
> > 
> > *IRCAD France*
> > Hôpitaux Universitaires - 1, place de l'Hôpital - 67091 Strasbourg Cedex
> > - FRANCE
> > 
> > Le 12/01/2022 à 15:17, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> > > Hi Flavien,
> > > 
> > > as you can see below ITK4 is buggy and we switched to ITK5 anyway so
> > > ITK4 will be removed.  To verify whether sight might build with ITK5
> > > smoothly I simply replaced libinsighttoolkit4-dev by
> > > libinsighttoolkit5-dev in (Build-)Depends[1], but obviously:
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > [ 81%] Building CXX object libs/io/dicom/test/CMakeFiles/io_dicomTest.dir/tu/DicomAnonymizerTest.cpp.o
> > > cd /build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/io/dicom/test && /usr/bin/c++ -DBOOST_ALL_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB -DBOOST_ATOMIC_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_CHRONO_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_DATE_TIME_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_FILESYSTEM_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_IOSTREAMS_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_LOG_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_LOG_SETUP_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_REGEX_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_SPIRIT_USE_PHOENIX_V3 -DBOOST_THREAD_DONT_PROVIDE_DEPRECATED_FEATURES_SINCE_V3_0_0 -DBOOST_THREAD_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_THREAD_PROVIDES_FUTURE -DBOOST_THREAD_VERSION=2 -DIO_DICOMTEST_EXPORTS -I/build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/core/pch/pchCore/include/pchCore -I/build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/io/dicom/include -I/build/sight-21.0.0/libs -I/build/sight-21.0.0/libs/core -I/build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/io/base/include -I/build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/core/core/include -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/core/data/include -I/build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/core/service/include -I/build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/core/activity/include -I/build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/filter/dicom/include -I/build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/geometry/data/include -I/build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/io/zip/include -I/build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/core/utestData/include -I/build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/core/utest/include -isystem /usr/include/gdcm-3.0 -isystem /usr/lib -isystem /usr/include/cppunit -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/build/sight-21.0.0=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O3 -DNDEBUG -fPIE -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -march=sandybridge -mtune=generic -mfpmath=sse -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wall -Wextra -Wconversion -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-ignored-qualifiers -fPIC -std=gnu++17 -include "pch.hpp"  -Winvalid-pch -MD -MT libs/io/dicom/test/CMakeFiles/io_dicomTest.dir/tu/DicomAnonymizerTest.cpp.o -MF CMakeFiles/io_dicomTest.dir/tu/DicomAnonymizerTest.cpp.o.d -o CMakeFiles/io_dicomTest.dir/tu/DicomAnonymizerTest.cpp.o -c /build/sight-21.0.0/libs/io/dicom/test/tu/DicomAnonymizerTest.cpp
> > > /build/sight-21.0.0/libs/filter/image/SpheroidExtraction.cpp:34:10: fatal error: itkLabelGeometryImageFilter.h: No such file or directory
> > >     34 | #include <itkLabelGeometryImageFilter.h>
> > >        |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > compilation terminated.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ... the situation is more complex.  Would you mind switching the
> > > upstream code to ITK5?
> > > 
> > > Kind regards
> > > 
> > >       Andreas.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > [1]https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/sight/-/commit/4dfa098d04116ef8c0320e6786e50337d0059ce7
> > > 
> > > ----- Weitergeleitete Nachricht von Debian testing autoremoval watch<noreply@release.debian.org>  -----
> > > 
> > > Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 04:39:32 +0000
> > > From: Debian testing autoremoval watch<noreply@release.debian.org>
> > > To:sight@packages.debian.org
> > > Subject: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing
> > > 
> > > sight 21.0.0-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2022-02-09
> > > 
> > > It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
> > > 984284: insighttoolkit4: otb: ftbfs with GCC-11
> > >   https://bugs.debian.org/984284
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > This mail is generated by:
> > > https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl
> > > 
> > > Autoremoval data is generated by:
> > > https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Debian-med-packaging mailing list
> > > Debian-med-packaging@alioth-lists.debian.net
> > > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ----- Ende weitergeleitete Nachricht -----
> > > 




-- 
http://fam-tille.de


Reply to: