Sight needs to be ported to insighttoolkit5 [Fwd: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing]
Hi Flavien,
as you can see below ITK4 is buggy and we switched to ITK5 anyway so
ITK4 will be removed. To verify whether sight might build with ITK5
smoothly I simply replaced libinsighttoolkit4-dev by
libinsighttoolkit5-dev in (Build-)Depends[1], but obviously:
...
[ 81%] Building CXX object libs/io/dicom/test/CMakeFiles/io_dicomTest.dir/tu/DicomAnonymizerTest.cpp.o
cd /build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/io/dicom/test && /usr/bin/c++ -DBOOST_ALL_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB -DBOOST_ATOMIC_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_CHRONO_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_DATE_TIME_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_FILESYSTEM_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_IOSTREAMS_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_LOG_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_LOG_SETUP_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_REGEX_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_SPIRIT_USE_PHOENIX_V3 -DBOOST_THREAD_DONT_PROVIDE_DEPRECATED_FEATURES_SINCE_V3_0_0 -DBOOST_THREAD_DYN_LINK -DBOOST_THREAD_PROVIDES_FUTURE -DBOOST_THREAD_VERSION=2 -DIO_DICOMTEST_EXPORTS -I/build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/core/pch/pchCore/include/pchCore -I/build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/io/dicom/include -I/build/sight-21.0.0/libs -I/build/sight-21.0.0/libs/core -I/build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/io/base/include -I/build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/core/core/include -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/core/data/include -I/build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/core/service/include -I/build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/core/activity/include -I/build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/filter/dicom/include -I/build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/geometry/data/include -I/build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/io/zip/include -I/build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/core/utestData/include -I/build/sight-21.0.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/libs/core/utest/include -isystem /usr/include/gdcm-3.0 -isystem /usr/lib -isystem /usr/include/cppunit -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/build/sight-21.0.0=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O3 -DNDEBUG -fPIE -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -march=sandybridge -mtune=generic -mfpmath=sse -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wall -Wextra -Wconversion -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-ignored-qualifiers -fPIC -std=gnu++17 -include "pch.hpp" -Winvalid-pch -MD -MT libs/io/dicom/test/CMakeFiles/io_dicomTest.dir/tu/DicomAnonymizerTest.cpp.o -MF CMakeFiles/io_dicomTest.dir/tu/DicomAnonymizerTest.cpp.o.d -o CMakeFiles/io_dicomTest.dir/tu/DicomAnonymizerTest.cpp.o -c /build/sight-21.0.0/libs/io/dicom/test/tu/DicomAnonymizerTest.cpp
/build/sight-21.0.0/libs/filter/image/SpheroidExtraction.cpp:34:10: fatal error: itkLabelGeometryImageFilter.h: No such file or directory
34 | #include <itkLabelGeometryImageFilter.h>
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.
... the situation is more complex. Would you mind switching the
upstream code to ITK5?
Kind regards
Andreas.
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/sight/-/commit/4dfa098d04116ef8c0320e6786e50337d0059ce7
----- Weitergeleitete Nachricht von Debian testing autoremoval watch <noreply@release.debian.org> -----
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 04:39:32 +0000
From: Debian testing autoremoval watch <noreply@release.debian.org>
To: sight@packages.debian.org
Subject: sight is marked for autoremoval from testing
sight 21.0.0-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2022-02-09
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
984284: insighttoolkit4: otb: ftbfs with GCC-11
https://bugs.debian.org/984284
This mail is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release-tools/-/blob/master/mailer/mail_autoremovals.pl
Autoremoval data is generated by:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/udd/testing_autoremovals_gatherer.pl
_______________________________________________
Debian-med-packaging mailing list
Debian-med-packaging@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging
----- Ende weitergeleitete Nachricht -----
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: