[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Restricting kma architectures to 64 bit?




On 8/23/21 9:00 PM, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> Recently I added autopkgtest to the latest version of resfinder, which uses kma_index binary from src:kma package. That started failing on
> 32 bit architectures[1]
> 
> I reported the same upstream, and upstream says that kma could never work properly on 32-bit arches, see here[2]
> However, kma had been passing its own autopkgtests on 32 bit arches for a while now -- now when I checked, for example this[3]
> I see that it actually throws an error, but the test passes because the upstream did not exit with the right exit code, which they have fixed now.
> 
> Should I file removal bug for removals from all 32-bit arches for kma?

$ reverse-depends kma                                  
Reverse-Recommends
* med-bio

Reverse-Depends
* kmerresistance [amd64 arm64 armel armhf i386 mips64el mipsel ppc64el s390x]
* resfinder
* virulencefinder

$ reverse-depends kma -b
Reverse-Build-Depends
* resfinder-db


Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: