Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille, on 2021-01-27 21:42:41 +0100: > I think, if the test might pass without this option we could go with > this or even remove those tests temporarily and discuss the issue with > upstream without pressure of an open RC bug (which is unrelated). I would vote against skipping this test, as it shows the underlying code is not functional. I reinforced a bit my patch, given that the initial implementation was rather fragile and pushed another iteration. I'm fine about `dch -r` the package and upload tomorrow to close presently open bugs, if there are no objections; I see I have DM permissions on this one. There is an ever growing breadcrumb of patches not forwarded upstream behind me, I think I'll have to spend some time forwarding them appropriately, at the end of the week hopefully. Have a good evening, -- Étienne Mollier <etienne.mollier@mailoo.org> Fingerprint: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da Sent from /dev/pts/0, please excuse my verbosity.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature