[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] kmc_3.1.1+dfsg-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Happy to help! Feel free to ping me via email directly or CC email about non-x86 portability issues in packages.
FYI: This particular set of patches does need to be cleaned up and sent upstream, as do the patches[0] for onednn and wtdbg2.

When packages are not portable, we should document why in a dated comment in debian/control so that we don't repeatedly try to port packages that have significant fundamental issues (like hand written assembler, or requiring 64 bit archs).

If this is agreeable to the team, perhaps someone wants to volunteer to document this convention in the Debian-Med policy[1]?

[0] https://wiki.debian.org/SIMDEverywhere#Packages_Status
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/policy/-/blob/master/policy.rst

On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 at 20:04, Étienne Mollier <etienne.mollier@mailoo.org> wrote:
Debian FTP Masters, on 2021-01-22 11:48:44 +0000:
> Accepted:
> Changes:
>  kmc (3.1.1+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=medium
>  .
>    * Team upload.
>  .
>    [ Étienne Mollier ]
>    * Remove non-portable -m64 flag put back by error.
>  .
>    [ Michael R. Crusoe ]
>    * Support non-x86 systems via libsimde-dev. Closes: #977498

Amazing!  Thanks!  :)

(My apologies for the i386 issue, I spotted it but forgot to
 push it earlier.)

Kind Regards,
Étienne Mollier <etienne.mollier@mailoo.org>
Fingerprint:  8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c  8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
Sent from /dev/pts/2, please excuse my verbosity.

Reply to: