[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: qiime2 status update

Hi Étienne,

On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 12:06:45AM +0100, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Hi there,
> Sorry it took quite a long time, I kind of struggled a bit with
> the test suite of qiime.  In the end I had to disable the build
> time test, since apparently, pkg_resources is rather picky about
> the location of its modules, and the hack in place was not
> working with python 3.8 and 3.9.  For the moment, testing is
> delayed to autopkgtest, but I reckon this is not ideal, only one
> python version is tested that way.
> I pushed some patches[0] which should unlock the situation for
> Qiime and q2-* packages, giving some room to close bugs #974716,
> #974717, #974726, #974733, #974839 and #974840, right on time
> for the advent calendar.

Thanks a lot for tackling this!

> Changes are not marked ready for
> upload yet, as there might still be some blocking points
> reported by the package tracker[1], notably 32-bits support.

I'd vote for droping 32-bit report since I could imagine that
this is not relevant any more for QIIME.

I'll go on granting you Upload permissions for those packages
I've seen commits from yours.

Thanks again


> [0] https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/qiime
> [1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/qiime
> Kind Regards,
> -- 
> Étienne Mollier <etienne.mollier@mailoo.org>
> Fingerprint:  8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c  8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
> Sent from /dev/pts/5, please excuse my verbosity.


Reply to: