[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gsort_0.1.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED



Hi Steffen,

This package has probably been accepted and this dak errors occurs due to "Built-Using" field in d/control which I forgot to remove earlier.
Could you please $git pull from salsa and upload to NEW again? In principle it'd get accepted just in some time. (minutes?)

We also faced this earlier in vcfanno and seqkit and vcfanno which were fixed after a re-upload with "Built-Using" removed.[1][2][3][4]

[1] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/2020-October/085330.html
[2]: https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/2020-October/085353.html
[2]:https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/2020-October/085331.html
[4]: https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/2020-October/085356.html

Regards
Nilesh

On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 at 02:40, Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org> wrote:

An exception was raised while processing the package:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_policy.py", line 109, in wrapper
    function(upload, srcqueue, comments, transaction)
  File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_policy.py", line 236, in comment_accept
    extra_archives=[upload.target_suite.archive],
  File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 450, in copy_binary
    self._ensure_extra_source_exists(filename, db_source, archive, extra_archives=extra_archives)
  File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 244, in _ensure_extra_source_exists
    raise ArchiveException('{0}: Built-Using refers to package {1} (= {2}) not in target archive {3}.'.format(filename, source.source, source.version, archive.archive_name))
daklib.archive.ArchiveException: g/gsort/gsort_0.1.4-1_amd64.deb: Built-Using refers to package golang-github-alexflint-go-scalar (= 1.0.0+ds-1) not in target archive ftp-master.

Original comments:




===

Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.


Reply to: