Re: Build issues for new version of bcftools

To: debian-med@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Build issues for new version of bcftools
From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 15:14:40 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20201001131440.GR8133@an3as.eu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4769034d-8db3-fb02-e626-23c91c4dc332@gmx.de>
References: <[🔎] 20201001114418.GQ8133@an3as.eu> <[🔎] 4769034d-8db3-fb02-e626-23c91c4dc332@gmx.de>

Hi Steffen,

On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 01:55:59PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> https://github.com/samtools/htslib/search?q=BCF_SR_ALLOW_NO_IDX
> 
> see
> 
> https://github.com/samtools/htslib/pull/1089

Thanks for spotting.  I'm going to update htslib first and will probably
follow a lets-see-what-might-get-broken strategy when doing so.

Kind regards

       Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

Reply to:

References:
- Build issues for new version of bcftools
  - From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
- Re: Build issues for new version of bcftools
  - From: Steffen Möller <steffen_moeller@gmx.de>

Prev by Date: Re: When presenting Debian Med - worthwhile to point to the need to update packages as contributions?
Next by Date: Re: When presenting Debian Med - worthwhile to point to the need to update packages as contributions?
Previous by thread: Re: Build issues for new version of bcftools
Next by thread: Re: Build issues for new version of bcftools
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread