Re: Problem when trying to upgrade htsjdk
On Sun, 2020-09-13 at 21:37 +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote:
> Hi Andreas, hi everyone,
>
> Le 11/09/2020 à 09:08, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried to upgrade htsjdk[1] but unfortunately I got some build
> > time
> > test errors. It would be great if somebody could have a look.
> >
>
> I have looked and tried to build, which succeeded. Then I looked at
> the
> log and noticed, to sum up, 4 points:
>
> - many tests output to stdout or stderr because they are verbose but
> they succeed : no problem with them;
>
> - the test
> htsjdk.samtools.SAMSequenceDictionaryTest.testMergeDictionaries[7]
> outputs an error, but it's OK because it is expected to raise an
> Exception;
>
> - the test
> htsjdk.samtools.CRAMReferencelessTest.testReadCRAMWithEmbeddedReferen
> ce
> outputs several messages like
>
> Ignoring SAM validation error: ERROR::INVALID_ALIGNMENT_START:Read
this test and the other one shows "Ignoring SAM validation error" so I
guess it is ok....
Olivier
> name
> 20FUKAAXX100202:2:1:20271:61529, Mate Alignment start (9999748) must
> be
> <= reference sequence length (200) on reference 20
>
> I guess this is bad, but don't know what to do with it;
>
> - the tests htsjdk.samtools.SAMFileWriterFactoryTest.testMakeWriter*
> output lines like
> Ignoring SAM validation error:
> ERROR::HEADER_RECORD_MISSING_REQUIRED_TAG:File
> /work/testMakeWriterPathbam, Error parsing SAM header. @RG line
> missing
> SM tag. Line: @RG ID:1
>
> I don't know either what to do with it.
>
> Does anyone have some experience with htsjdk to guide me? Inspecting
> the
> inputs of the tests is hard because many files are binary.
>
> > Kind regards
> >
> > Andreas.
> >
> >
>
> Best regards,
> Pierre
>
--
Olivier Sallou
Univ Rennes, Inria, CNRS, IRISA
Irisa, Campus de Beaulieu
F-35042 RENNES - FRANCE
Tel: 02.99.84.71.95
gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org)
Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438
Reply to: