[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: makeblastdb 2.10.x on 32-bit architectures



Hi Aaron,

Aaron M. Ucko, on 2020-09-07 21:55:45 -0400:
> Étienne Mollier <etienne.mollier@mailoo.org> writes:
> 
> > Thanks for your work on this topic.  I attempted to remove the
> > patches to address #960756 in Biopython.  While the problem is
> > fixed on i386 without having to fall back on version 4, I hit a
> > very similar issue on amd64 this time.
> 
> Oops, I accidentally introduced a regression on 64-bit architectures;
> fixed in -3 just now.  (An intended formal clarification misfired.)

No problem, I have done my fair share of oopses here and there,
that could happen to anybody.  I confirm I haven't seen the bug
reappear on amd64 or i386 with the new version.  The patch for
working the test around could now be safely dropped.

> Thank you very much for pointing it out!

You're most welcome, glad you could solve it so quickly!

Have a nice day,  :)
-- 
Étienne Mollier <etienne.mollier@mailoo.org>
Old rsa/3072: 5ab1 4edf 63bb ccff 8b54  2fa9 59da 56fe fff3 882d
New rsa/4096: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c  8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
Sent from /dev/pts/2, please excuse my verbosity.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: